Philip Dru: Administrator - A Story of Tomorrow by Colonel House CFR Founder

Colonel House was the founder of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relation) - Rockefeller's controlled organization - and intimate advisor of President Woodrow Wilson whom he choose as "candidate for the presidential election of 1912" (quoted from the Yale University library archives):

"In 1911 Colonel House took interest in finding a candidate for the presidential election of 1912 who could be depended on to work for the causes in which he believed. These causes he had endorsed by writing an anonymous novel, Philip Dru: Administrator, in which his fictitious hero, making himself a benign dictator, abolished protective tariffs, set up a system for social security, and arranged for the representation of labor on corporate boards and for a sharing of profits among the workers. Moreover, he imposed a graduated income tax, and developed a banking system that presaged the Federal Reserve; and he united the Great Powers of the world in a league for collective security."

As you can see, this book represents a masterpiece in the explanation of the making of History that Colonel House fully endorsed: "Most of it," he wrote of his novel, "I stand upon as being both my ethical and political faith."

I have read the book online in full length. There's nothing really shocking. Nevertheless It is a clue that the Rockefellers, through Colonel House - founder of their CFR organization - , wanted to convince the mass public since very long (1911) that "Corporatism" is very "Socialistic" idea asking people (see excerpt from the book on next paragraph):

- "to curb their prejudice against corporations"

- to accept that "if the business prospered, wages should be high; if times were dull, they should be reduced"

- to accept the idea of "business conducted by corporations" rather than "by individuals in a private capacity"

So the ones who control the Mega-Corporations today are the same who implemented that kind of "pseudo-socialistic" ideas since the 1911. This "formal socialism" from the super-elites has nothing to do with the dream of "people's socialism". It is a fabricated scheme which conducts today to Globalization through the power of these Mega-Corporations.

And as you can see clearly "private capacity" (e.g. the right for individual property of the mean of production) is not really favored (at least for "natural resources" which control the life of all people on the planet). This is logical from the viewpoint of George Orwell's explanation on Warfare in his1984's novel. Under the disguise of pseudo-socialism is the maintenance of old Plutocracy for it's just a renewal of this latter under a more acceptable apparent form for the mass public who is ignorant of the History of Concepts.

It is then not astonishing that in our modern time, the full power of the establishment triangle emerged for an Alliance as Sir James Goldsmith (British billionaire businessman) put it once during the Mike Milken's trial:

"I don't know whether or not Mike Milken realized at the time that he had found a way of financing an immense revolution in America, but now he has witnessed the full power of the establishment triangle: big business, big unions and big government. As I European, I witnessed the same alliance trying to avoid change and neutralizing those responsible for it."

-- Sir James Goldsmith, British billionaire businessman, former client of Mike Milken, quoted by Edward Jay Epstein in "The Secret World of Mike Milken", 1987

Yeah, that's it, "formal socialism" from the super elites do only serve the purpose of neutralizing.

He had incorporated in the Franchise Law the right of Labor to have one representative upon the boards of corporations and to share a certain percentage of the earnings above their wages, after a reasonable per cent. upon the capital had been earned. In turn, it was to be obligatory upon them not to strike, but to submit all grievances to arbitration. The law was to stipulate that if the business prospered, wages should be high; if times were dull, they should be reduced.

...

The people were asked to curb their prejudice against corporations. It was promised that in the future corporations should be honestly run, and in the interest of the stockholders and the public. Dru expressed the hope that their formation would be welcomed rather than discouraged, for he was sure that under the new law it would be more to the public advantage to have business conducted by corporations than by individuals in a private capacity.