Ron Paul on Federal Reserve: the power to transfer wealth from the middle class to the rich class

62

By thecounterpunch

The Federal Reserve Monopoly over Money by Ron Paul

The Federal Reserve Monopoly over Money

April 9, 2007

Recently I had the opportunity to question Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke when he appeared before the congressional Joint Economic committee. The topic that morning was the state of the American economy, and many of my colleagues raised questions about how the Fed might better "regulate" things to ease fears of an economic downturn. The tenor of my colleagues' questions suggested that Mr. Bernanke's job is nothing less than to run the U.S. economy, like some kind of Soviet central planner.

Certainly it’s true that Mr. Bernanke can drastically affect the economy at the drop of a hat, simply by making decisions about the money supply and interest rates. But why do members of Congress assume this is good? Why do we accept without objection that a small group of people on the Federal Reserve Board wields so much power over our economic well-being? Is centralized, monopoly control over our money even compatible with a supposedly free-market economy?

Few Americans give much thought to the Federal Reserve System or monetary policy in general. But even as they strive to earn a living, and hopefully save or invest for the future, Congress and the Federal Reserve Bank are working insidiously against them. Day by day, every dollar you have is being devalued.

The greatest threat facing America today is not terrorism, or foreign economic competition, or illegal immigration. The greatest threat facing America today is the disastrous fiscal policies of our own government, marked by shameless deficit spending and Federal Reserve currency devaluation. It is this one-two punch-- Congress spending more than it can tax or borrow, and the Fed printing money to make up the difference-- that threatens to impoverish us by further destroying the value of our dollars.

The Fed’s inflationary policies hurt older people the most. Older people generally rely on fixed incomes from pensions and Social Security, along with their savings. Inflation destroys the buying power of their fixed incomes, while low interest rates reduce any income from savings. So while Fed policies encourage younger people to overborrow because interest rates are so low, they also punish thrifty older people who saved for retirement.

The financial press sometimes criticizes Federal Reserve policy, but the validity of the fiat system itself is never challenged. Both political parties want the Fed to print more money, either to support social spending or military adventurism. Politicians want the printing presses to run faster and create more credit, so that the economy will be healed like magic- or so they believe.

Fiat dollars allow us to live beyond our means, but only for so long. History shows that when the destruction of monetary value becomes rampant, nearly everyone suffers and the economic and political structure becomes unstable. Spendthrift politicians may love a system that generates more and more money for their special interest projects, but the rest of us have good reason to be concerned about our monetary system and the future value of our dollars.

Comments

Ralph Deeds profile image

Ralph Deeds Level 6 Commenter 5 years ago

That's a radical, libertarian view. He ignores the increase in unemployment that can result from a no or very low inflation policy. Paul cites the run-away inflation in Germany in the 1930s and Argentina and implies that we are suffering or are in danger of experiencing something akin to that. Not so. Inflation has been moderate in recent years.

I like Paul's views on Iraq better.

thecounterpunch profile image

thecounterpunch Hub Author 5 years ago

"Inflation has been moderate in recent years.": in official stats :). But in fact yes inflation is hidden ... some part in Stock Market's inflaion. When the market will crash ...

As for me I'm not Libertarian - in truth I have no political or religious color indeed - so I don't agree with all he said: I only post what he said. For example I already said on Chuck's hubpages that I didn't agree that Gold is the solution. Saying that is forgetting history about who set up Gold Standard before clashing it. The problem is not between Gold or not Gold but I will tell more in another post.

livelonger profile image

livelonger Level 6 Commenter 5 years ago

I think the reason Ron Paul has gotten so popular is that he's a throwback to the classic "paleoconservative" that we haven't seen much of since the Reagan era. And I think people are sick and tired of neoconservative ("neo" in this case meaning "even worse").

At the same time, even paleoconservative is still not that great.

MobyWho profile image

MobyWho Level 4 Commenter 5 months ago

Hi Counterpunch - just saw this post of yours from 2007 and would like to see an update to 2012 (a few weeks away). All politics aside, what is the latest gold vs paper relationship? Where do the various presidential contenders stand on this subject? As an ultra-senior, I'm not into jobs, but inflation is a real fear-factor...and I still have a vote! Thanks.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working